The unspoken rule

Another broad theme which emerged in my project*** was the theme of Self-Sufficiency & Stigma, in which participants expressed their hesitations to open up about their experiences as a man within American culture. Broadly, all the participants reported never being sat down and told what a man “should or should not be”, save for messages of chivalry and that men don’t hit women. Instead, the messages of what it meant to be a man were learned from watching others and absorbed through values instilled in them on the field. However, most participants identified the value of self-sufficiency as something that was tied to their concept of masculinity. In discussing the need to be self-reliant, there was a sense, across most participants, that their ability to be self-sufficient was intertwined with their perceived success as a man.

Hunter:  If you answered the – if you phrase the question as do you feel comfortable asking for help, asking for help, um, I would have said strongly disagree I think on almost all of them [Laughs]. Um, I don’t know where that comes from.  Maybe that’s, maybe that’s one of like the, what does it mean to you to be a man.  

Matt:  Um, I think that a lot of people, and this again might be, you know, is one of the     qualities that I think some men are taught growing up is like, you know, you figured out on your own you can do – the direction.  You don’t need to ask directions, everything can be done by your own.

Connor:  I remember my mom asking me in high school – I crashed my car, I wasn’t playing well on the football field and my girlfriend dumped me and I was depressed probably.  I was like really upset for like a month and she said, ‘Do you want me to take  you to a psychologist?’ And I was like, “What?  No, I don’t want to do that.” She was like, ‘I think you need to talk to someone.’ And I just remember being like no, I’m too manly for that to be honest.  To be honest I think it’s hard for the stereotypical man, football player to say, “Hey, I want to sit down and talk about my feelings.”...So like I never really did that with my dad.  That’s weird. 

Given the overall goal of my project was to unearth barriers to mental health services, I explored the ways in which the need for self-sufficiency may impact a man’s decision to seek help. Many participants discussed an unspoken agreement among men to only offer advice or recommend seeking help when they specifically asked—otherwise, the assumption should be that the other man could take care of himself. Even amongst teammates who spend a majority of their time together and are bonded through time and competition, all of the men shared they would be extremely hesitant to approach a teammate (or other male friend) with their struggles or ask about theirs. Importantly, this traditional masculine ideal of self-sufficiency and the internalized image of the invincible football warrior reinforce one another as young football players negotiate the stressors of their lives, and decrease the likelihood of these young men seeking help.

Hunter: ...college football players are probably less likely to seek that sort of thing out –for the same reason, versus an NFL player, for the same reason that any college student is less likely to seek that sort of thing out, versus someone who’s you know older, has a sense of invincibility.  Ah, I’ll get through this and whatever else.

Connor:  I do think as a football player and especially as a man you get in this place where it’s like you can’t – you don’t really want to – you can’t be sensitive.

As a clinician, it is imperative to work to reduce the stigma of seeking and offering help within full athletic system. The “see something—say something” mantra has begun to be instilled on high school and college campuses, but it will require a more concerted effort within Athletic Departments and individual teams.

***Based on results from my dissertation: "No pain, no gain: American football players' attitudes towards help-seeking and barriers to mental health service utilization" (2015).

You're a football player.

Another major theme that emerged in my study centered around the way others grouped football players together, for better or worse, and this theme was called deindividuation of football players. This social grouping, or deindividuation, was often mirrored within the culture and structure of American football, again, for better or worse.

Most of the participants noted the visibility of being an athlete and therefore the strong identification as a football player by others. For themselves, most participants described the importance of their athletic identity on a personal and social level. Their athletic identification was a positive source of pride and a social facilitator in most situations. Many shared that being a football player opened doors, both during and after college, to rare social and occupational opportunities. Within their team, all of the participants described a sense of family, brotherhood, and accountability to your teammates as a vital element within football. Additionally, many participants described the "put it on film" culture of football, and the opportunity to give and receive feedback as an equalizing force in which each person was responsible to their teammates and each player had the opportunity to provide valuable input to advance the team's success.

However, a majority of the participants described the limiting messages and stereotypes (i.e. “the dumb jock”) they received regarding their academic and emotional abilities as football players. Importantly, the participants who also identified as men of color were particularly aware of messages that spoke to their value, and some were given the message that football was their primary, if not only, avenue for success. Additionally, because of increased visibility, several participants described instances in which they were targeted as football players, usually at parties or local bars, and would get caught up in physical altercations. Within their team, a majority of the participants criticized the prevalent deindividualized values of sacrificing one's body and playing through pain within football culture. These values, coupled with the focus on individual statistics, often left participants feeling like "a piece of man meat"...a replaceable unit in a greater system.

Similarly, participants highlighted the glorification and vicarious experience of violence within football as part of broader American culture. More on that in the next post…

***Based on results from my dissertation: "No pain, no gain: American football players' attitudes towards help-seeking and barriers to mental health service utilization" (2015).

Football hierarchy--the importance of feedback and role clarity

Building upon my last blog post, regardless of how the team culture is established by coaches—all participants*** emphasized the hierarchical nature of football teams and organizations.The players indicated the hierarchical structure can be formal/explicit or informal/implicit; the value of the hierarchy also differs between teams depending on coaching values and the corresponding team values.

The participants all agreed that the hierarchy in a football organization is structured as follows: ownership and management/college athletic director is at top and is responsible for hiring coaches and personnel; next is the head coach and then other coordinators and position coaches who are responsible for setting team culture, determining style of play and playing time for players; next are the team captains and veteran players who are responsible for maintaining the team culture and partially responsible for modeling and enforcing expected behaviors; next are the exceptional players and the starters; next is the rest of the team who are either fighting for a starting spot or trying to solidify their roles as key role players; finally are the players on the scout teams and those on injured reserve. 

Importantly, all of the participants felt their value as a football player (and place within the team’s hierarchy) was determined week-by-week according to their performance on the field. Oftentimes participants (as many athletes do) used specific quantitative statistics to illustrate their value, and they shared the stress of becoming hyper-focused on their stats. Most of the participants described the constant pressure to maintain or improve their position within the team. As a result, most participants described the roller coaster of emotions week-to-week, and several participants described players’ increased focus on trying to control their environment, which led to some teammates using substances to cope with the ups-and-downs.

As a clinician, I find myself helping athletes cope with the stress of within-team competition just as often as external competition. In order to thrive and be successful, athletes must be able to strive for individual success while making the success of the team a priority. One of the most important lessons I can help an athlete learn is the importance of seeking feedback and role clarity. The unknown can be a paralyzing force. Seeking feedback from trainers, teammates, and coaches is a fundamental skill that can help reduce the worries associated with the unknown. Athletes can be hesitant to seek direct feedback about their performance or areas for growth, but doing so will help the athlete improve and will provide clarity about their role on their team. With that information, the athlete can then decide whether they are satisfied with their role or whether they would like their role to change. 

***Based on results from my dissertation: "No pain, no gain: American football players' attitudes towards help-seeking and barriers to mental health service utilization" (2015).

The problem with 'mental toughness'

Vince Lombardi once said, “Mental toughness is many things and rather difficult to explain.  Its qualities are sacrifice and self-denial.  Also, most importantly, it is combined with a perfectly disciplined will that refuses to give in. It’s a state of mind – you could call it ‘character in action’” (Family of Vince Lombardi, 2010, Famous Quotes).  

Mental toughness, or more recently 'grit', is a term tossed around within the sports world as if everyone knows what it means and who has 'it'. There doesn't seem to be a consensus on what mental toughness is, what it looks like, or how to develop it. When asked what mental toughness means, most people begin to falter, trying to grab onto a definition that eludes them. On one end of the spectrum many people fall back on the you know it when you see it description, and on the other end other folks say mental toughness is akin to not giving up.

People talk of mental toughness as if it is a mental state you will yourself into on the field. The goal is for athletes to compartmentalize their struggles and push all of their fears/doubts/worries aside. The ability to compartmentalize is glorified and pervasive in sports culture with such idioms coming to mind: leave the last play behind you; leave it all on the field; shut out the rest and just play; shake it off; don't think about it, etc. But the truth of the matter is our brains do not work this way--there isn't a separate brain structure for competing athletically that shuts down other areas of the brain. We are a collection of our experiences and we can no more tune out the rest of our life during competition than we can breathe underwater. It's just physically not possible. In this way, we're setting athletes up to fail by glorifying an impossible way of being and performing.

Instead, perhaps we should be taking a step back and helping athletes develop resilient mental health, which must be developed and continually supported. More on that another time.

 

Family of Vince Lombardi (2010). Famous Quotes. Retrieved on October 5, 2012 from: http://www.vincelombardi.com/quotes.html.